We must also take into account other socializing agents that can socialize us and make us develop a form of partisan identification. This is an alternative way which is another answer to the question of how to evaluate the position of different parties and candidates. Sometimes, indeed often, people combine the first two models incorporating the psycho-sociological model on the basis that the Michigan model is just an extension of the Columbia model that helps explain some things that the Columbia model cannot explain. As part of spatial theories of the vote, some theories consider the characteristics of candidates. In other words, when we are interested in trying to explain the vote, we must already know what type of voter we are talking about. Grofman's idea is to say that the voter discounts what the candidates say (discounting) based on the difference between current policy and what the party says it will do or promise. Regarding the causal ambiguity, there are also critics who say that this approach is very strongly correlational in the sense that it looks for correlations between certain social variables and electoral choices, but the approach does not explain why this variable approach really has a role and therefore what are the causal mechanisms that lead from insertion, positions, social predispositions to electoral choice. The idea is that there is something easier to evaluate which is the ideology of a party and that it is on the basis of this that the choice will be made. What explains historical variation in voter turnout? Many researchers have criticised the Downs proximity model in particular. These are voters who proceed by systematic voting. Inking and the role of socialization cause individuals to form a certain partisan identification that produces certain types of political attitudes. There are three possible answers: May's Law of Curvilinear Disparity is an answer that tries to stay within the logic of the proximity model and to account for this empirical anomaly, but with the idea that it is distance and proximity that count. On the basis of this, we can know. This is the idea that gave rise to the development of directional models, which is that, according to Downs and those who have followed him, because there is transparency of information, voters can very well see what the political platforms of the parties or candidates are. The initial formulation of the model is based on the Downs theory in An Economic Theory of Democracy publi en 1957. These authors find with panel data that among their confirmed hypotheses that extroverted people tend to have a strong and stable partisan identification. So there is an overestimation in this model with respect to capacity. The psycho-sociological model, also known as the Michigan model, can be represented graphically or schematically. the difference in the cost-benefit ratio that different parties give. xxxiii, 178. Finally, there is an instrumental approach to information and voting. When we talk about the Downs model, we also talk about the proximity model, which is the idea of a rational economic mode based on utility maximization. From the parties' perspective, this model makes different predictions than the simple proximity model, which made a prediction of convergence of a centripetal force with respect to party positioning. Print. Voting is an act of altruism. Is partisan identification one-dimensional? This is called prospective voting because voters will listen to what the parties have to say and evaluate on the basis of that, that is, looking ahead. Apart from the combined models, it can be thought that different models may explain differently according to historical moments and phases of a process of political alignment and misalignment just as models may better explain certain types of candidates or according to the profile and type of voters. 135150. However, this is empirically incorrect. In other words, they propose something quite ecumenical that combines directional and proximity models. This is especially important when applying this type of reasoning empirically. In other words, the homing tendency that is the explanation that the model postulates is much less true outside the United States. The aspect is based on the idea that there is an information problem that represents a difficulty and costs that voters must pay to gather information and to become informed about an election. What is interesting is that they try to relate this to personality traits such as being open, conscientious, extroverted, pleasant and neurotic. Pp. Positioning on a left-right scale is related to this type of theory. One possible strategy to reduce costs is to base oneself on ideology. Models of Voting Behavior Models of Voting Behavior Dr. Bradley Best Asst. Also called the Columbia model (after the university from whence came the researchers), the sociological model of voting behavior was constructed with the intention of studying the effect of media on voting choice. This is the median voter theory. They find that partisan identification becomes more stable with age, so the older you get, the more partisan identification you have, so it's much easier to change when you're young. In spring of 2021, key people working in homelessness services in Vancouver flew to San Diego to learn about the Alpha Project's model . There has also been the criticism of abstention as the result of rational calculation. From that point on, there has been the development of a whole body of literature on political psychology. There is no real electoral choice in this type of explanation, but it is based on our insertion in a social context. 0000007835 00000 n Several studies show that the impact of partisan identification varies greatly from one context to another. endstream endobj 44 0 obj <> endobj 45 0 obj <> endobj 46 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>> endobj 47 0 obj <> endobj 48 0 obj <> endobj 49 0 obj <> endobj 50 0 obj <> endobj 51 0 obj <>stream In the study of electoral behaviour, there is a simple distinction between what is called prospective voting and retrospective voting. %PDF-1.3 % The utility function of this model is modified compared to the simple model, i.e. the maximum utility is reached at the line level. There is a whole literature on opinion formation, quite consensually, that says that citizens have a limited capacity to process information. 0000000636 00000 n This model explains for Downs why we abstain. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 261(1), 194194. A set of theories has given some answers. Psychology and Voting Behavior In the same years that behaviorism (of various forms) came to dominate the Partisan identification becomes stronger over time. That is what is called the proximity vote, that is, having a preference over a policy. It has often been emphasized that this model and approach raises more questions than answers. All parties that are in the same direction of the voter maximize the individual utility of that voter. This is a very common and shared notion. The image that an individual has of himself in this perspective is also the result of this identification. Value orientations refer to materialism as well as post-materialism, among other things, cleavages but no longer from a value perspective. We have seen that at Downs, the role of ideology is fundamental and that ideology could function as a kind of shortcut. The Logics of Electoral Politics. Although the models rely on the same data they make radically different predictions about the political future. (June 2012) Networks in electoral behavior, as a part of political science, refers to the relevance of networks in forming citizens' voting behavior at parliamentary, presidential or local elections. There are other cleavages that cut across Republicans and Democrats that should be taken into account to explain the pattern. There is an opposite reasoning. (Second edition.) But more generally, when there is a campaign, the issues are discussed. Today, this may be less true, but until a certain point, there were relatively few empirical analyses based on the economic model of the vote. LAZARSFELD, PAUL F., BERNARD BERELSON, and HAZEL GAUDET. He wanted to look for one thing and found something else. As for the intensity model, they manage to perceive something more, that is to say, not only a direction but an intensity through which a political party defends certain positions and goes in certain political directions. Fiorina proposed an alternative way to explain why voters vote for one party rather than another, or a different answer to how the position of different candidate parties can be assessed. The role of the media and campaigns simplifies information by summarizing it. We must assess the costs of going to the polls, of gathering the information needed to make a decision, but also the value of one's own participation, since the model is also supposed to explain voter turnout. There is also the economic vote, which is the role of the economy. in what is commonly known as the Columbia school of thought, posited that contextual factors influence the development . The cause-and-effect relationship is reversed, according to some who argue that this is a problem at the empirical level when we want to study the effect of partisan identification on electoral choice because there is a problem of endogeneity; we no longer know what explains what. Fiorina also talks about partisan identification, that is to say that there is a possible convergence between these different theories. The second question is according to which criteria to determine the individual utility of voters. a new model of legislative behavior that captures when and how lawmakers vote differently than expected. Some people talk about membership voting for the first two theories and cognitive voting for the economic model of voting. This is called retrospective voting, which means that we are not looking at what the parties said in their platforms, but rather at what the parties did before. These are possible answers more to justify and account for this anomaly. p. 31). (1949). We need to find identification measures adapted to the European context, which the researchers have done. The limitations are the explanation of partisan identification, which is that the model has been criticized because it explains or does not explain too much about where partisan identification comes from except to say that it is the result of primary socialization. Parties do not try to maximize the vote, but create images of society, forge identities, mobilize commitments for the future. There are certain types of factors that influence other types of factors and that in turn influence other types of factors and that ultimately help explain the idea of the causal funnel of electoral choice. This model of voting behavior sees the voter as thinking individual who is able to take a view on political issues and votes accordingly. They are voters who make the effort to inform themselves, to look at the proposals of the different parties and try to evaluate the different political offers. In summary, it can be said that in the economic model of voting, the political preferences of voters on different issues, are clearly perceived by the voters themselves which is the idea that the voter must assess his own interest, he must clearly perceive what are the political preferences of voters. There are different types of individuals who take different kinds of shortcuts or not, who vote systematically or not, and so on. The economic model of the vote puts the notion of electoral choice back at the centre. Three elements should be noted. Radical approach regards class-based (structural) model as outdated and insufficient to explain . Professor Political Science Buena Vista University Two basic concerns: Turnout ("Who votes?") Key questions: What are the characteristics and attitudes of voters vs. nonvoters? We end up with a configuration where there is an electorate that is at the centre, there are party activists who are exercising the "voice" and who have access to the extreme, and there are party leaderships that are in between. party loyalties are freed from their social base and thus these party identifications are formed and crystallized. Merrill and Grofman have proposed unified models that want to get out of this hyper-simplification with respect to spatial theories where one either makes a choice of possibilities or a choice of direction but evacuates any other element such as partisan identification, socialization, social inclusion, economic conditions as well as the role of opinion leaders as seen in the funnel model of Michigan theory. La dernire modification de cette page a t faite le 11 novembre 2020 00:26. Lazarsfeld was interested in this and simply, empirically, he found that these other factors had less explanatory weight than the factors related to political predisposition and therefore to this social inking. We are looking at the interaction. The Columbia County Supervisor of Elections strives to provide reasonable accomodations to help people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to participate on our website. In other words, there is a social type variable, a cultural type variable and a spatial type variable. Three notions must be distinguished: a phase of political alignment (1), which is when there is a strengthening of partisan loyalties, i.e. 0000001213 00000 n Thus, the interpretation of differences in voting behaviour from one group to another is to be sought in the position of the group in society and in the way its relations with parties have developed. Ideology is to be understood as a way of simplifying our world in relation to the problem of information. The idea of prospective voting is very demanding. Often, in Anglo-Saxon literature, this model is referred to as the party identification model. Voting requires voters to know the candidates' positions on issues, but when there are several candidates or several parties, it is not very easy for some voters in particular. The vote is seen here as an instrument, that is to say, there is the idea of an instrumental vote and not an expressive one. The voters choose the candidate whose positions will match their preferences. The explanatory factors and aspects highlighted by these different models are always taken into account. There are two important issues in relation to the spatial theory of voting. This is more related to the retrospective vote. In other words, they are voters who are not prepared to pay all these costs and therefore want to reduce or improve the cost-benefit ratio which is the basis of this electoral choice by reducing the costs and the benefit will remain unchanged. Hence the creation of the political predisposition index which should measure and capture the role of social insertion or position in explaining electoral choice. This approach has often been criticized as a static approach since socio-economic or even socio-demographic characteristics do not change in the short term and yet the vote increasingly changes in the short term, what is called in electoral volatility, i.e. This identification with a party is inherited from the family emphasizing the role of primary socialization, it is reinforced over time including a reinforcement that is given by the very fact of voting for that party. 0000000866 00000 n It is a third explanation given by Przeworski and Sprague in their theory of partisan competition, also known as the theory of mobilization of the electorate. 43 0 obj <> endobj A lawmaker's (stochastic) voting behavior is characterized by the relationship between her position in this space and the bill's position [1 . Voters try to maximize the usefulness of the vote, that is, they try to vote for the party that makes them more satisfied. In other words, this identification is part of the self-image one can have of oneself. From the point of view of parties and candidates, the economic model and in particular the model that was proposed by Downs in 1957 and which predicts a convergence of a party position towards the centre. Among these bridges, one of the first bridges between the psycho-sociological voting theory and the rationalist theories was made by Fiorina because he considers partisan identification to be an important element in explaining electoral choice. The function of partisan identification is to allow the voter to face political information and to know which party to vote for. So, we are going to the extremes precisely because we are trying to mobilize an electorate. On the other hand, the focus is on the political goals of the voters, whereas the psychological model puts a little more emphasis on the social use of the vote. changes in voting behaviour from one election to the next. Finally, in a phase of misalignment, this would be the economic model, since there is a loss of these partisan loyalties, so these voters become more and more reactive to political events and therefore may be more rational in their decision-making process. European Journal of Political Research, 54(2), 197215. What is partisan identification? This model relies heavily on the ability of voters to assess and calculate their own interests and all the costs associated with the action of going to the polls. Voting for a party and continuing to vote for such a party repeatedly makes it possible to develop an identification with that party which, in a way, then reinforces the electoral choice. The strategic choices made by parties can also be explained by this model since, since this model postulates an interdependence between supply and demand, we address the demand but we can also address the supply. We are not ignoring the psychological model, which focuses on the identification people have with parties without looking at the parties. For Iversen, distance is also important. In their view, ideology is a means of predicting political positions on a significant number of issues and also a basis for credible and consistent engagement by the party or candidate that follows it. This is the idea of collective action, since our own contribution to an election or vote changes with the number of other citizens who vote. Therefore, they cannot really situate where the different parties stand. 0000002253 00000 n These are some of the criticisms and limitations often made by proponents of other approaches. With regard to the limits, methodological individualism has often been evoked, saying that it is an exclusively micro-sociological perspective that neglects the effect of social structure. it is an element of direction and not an element of distance or proximity that counts. [1] New York: Columbia University Press, 1948. If you experience any difficulty accessing any part of this website, please call (386) 758-1026 or email kbanner@votecolumbiafl.gov for further assistance. Fiorina reverses the question, in fact, partisan identification can result from something else and it also produces electoral choices. This is called the proximity model. A unified theory of voting: directional and proximity spatial models. The answer to this second question will allow us to differentiate between proximity models and directional models because these two subsets of the spatial theories of voting give diametrically opposite answers to this question. In other words, in this retrospective assessment, the economic situation of the country plays a crucial role. %%EOF There is a small degree of complexity because one can distinguish between attitudes towards the candidate or the party, attitudes towards the policies implemented by the different parties and attitudes about the benefits that one's own group may receive from voting for one party rather than another. The voters have to make that assessment and then decide which one brings more income and which one we will vote for. It is interesting to know that Lazarsfeld, when he began his studies with survey data, especially in an electoral district in New York State, was looking for something other than the role of social factors. This has created a research paradigm which is perhaps the dominant paradigm today. The strategies and shortcuts are mainly used by citizens who are interested in going to vote or in an election but who do not have a strong preference beforehand. What determines direction? By finding something else, he shaped a dominant theory explaining the vote. <]>> Understanding voters' behavior can explain how and why decisions were made either by public decision-makers, which has been a central concern for political scientists, [1] or by the electorate. The curve instead of the simple proximity model, or obviously the maximization from the parties' point of view of electoral support, lies in the precise proximity between voters' preferences and the parties' political programs on certain issues, in this case this remains true but with a lag that is determined by discounting from a given status quo. Prospective voting says that the evaluation is based on what the parties and candidates are going to say. . Economic theories of voting explain both voter turnout (1) and electoral choice (2). There are several reasons that the authors of these directional models cite to explain this choice of direction with intensity rather than a choice of proximity as proposed by Downs. Nowadays, the internet is the most used communication environment, and therefore it becomes very important to try to determine the behavior of users regarding internet use. The second criterion is subjectivity, which is that voters calculate the costs and benefits of voting subjectively, so they make an assessment of the costs and benefits. The concept of electoral choice does not belong to the sociological model but rather to rationalist theories. This is the proximity model. It is an explanation that is completely outside the logic of proximity and the spatial logic of voting. This is something that remains difficult in theory, we don't know how much the voter will discount. Numerous studies examine voting behavior based on the formal theoretical predictions of the spatial utility model. According to Fiorina, retrospective voting is that citizens' preferences depend not only on how close they are to the political position of a party or candidate, but also on their retrospective assessment of the performance of the ruling party or candidate. Partisan attachment is at the centre of the graph influencing opinions on certain issues being discussed or the attitudes of certain candidates. These authors proposed to say that there would be a relationship between the explanatory models of the vote and the cycle of alignment, realignment, misalignment in the sense that the sociological model would be better able to explain the vote in phases of political realignment. This theory presupposed that the voter recognizes his or her own interest, assesses alternative candidates, and on the basis of this assessment, will choose for the candidate or party that will be most favourably assessed in the sense of best serving his or her own political interests and interests. 0000006260 00000 n The anomaly is that there is a majority of the electorate around the centre, but there are parties at the extremes that can even capture a large part of the preferences of the electorate. As far as the proximity model with discounting is concerned, there is a concern when we are going to apply it empirically: we need to be able to determine what the degree of discounting is, how much the voter is going to discount. The psycho-sociological model says that it is because this inking allows identification with a party which in turn influences political attitudes and therefore predispositions with regard to a given object, with regard to the candidate or the party, and this is what ultimately influences the vote. In this model, there is a region of acceptability of positional extremism which is a region outside of which the intensity of the positions or the direction shown by a party cannot go because if it goes beyond that region, the voter will no longer choose that party. Then a second question was supposed to measure the strength of that identification with the question "do you consider yourself a Republican, strong, weak or leaning towards the Democratic Party? There has been the whole emergence of the rational actor, which is the vote in relation to issues, which is not something that comes simply from our affective identification with a party, but there is a whole reflection that the voter makes in terms of cost-benefit calculations. There is a whole branch of the electoral literature that emphasizes government action as an essential factor in explaining the vote, and there is a contrast between a prospective vote, which is voting according to what the parties say they will do during the election campaign, and a retrospective vote, which is voting in relation to what has been done, particularly by the government, which has attributed the successes or failures of a policy. We must also, and above all, look at the links between types of factors. Downs, Anthony. There may be one that is at the centre, but there are also others that are discussed. This model shows that there is more than political identities, partisan identification and social inking. According to them, it is necessary to combine different types of explanations and in particular, in the electoral choice, the components related to proximity, leadership, and also the rather "intensity" leadership, all of which play a significant role in the positioning of candidates and parties. To summarize these approaches, there are four possible answers to the question of how voters decide to vote. On the basis of this analysis a behavioral model is constructed, which is then tested on data from a Dutch election survey. Basic Idea What you are vote choice ; Key foundational studies ; Lazarsfeld, Berelson, Gaudet (1944) The Peoples Choice Berelson, Lazarsfeld, McPhee (1954) Voting In this approach, it is possible to say that the voter accepts the arguments of a certain party because he or she feels close to a party and not the opposite which would be what the economic model of the vote postulates, that is to say that we listen to what the party has to say and we will choose that party because we are convinced by what that party says. Of shortcuts or not, and above all, look at the centre answer to the question of to. Raises more questions than answers say that there is also the economic model of voting identities... Insertion or position in explaining electoral choice does not belong to the next be represented or... Michigan model, can be represented graphically or schematically spatial type variable and a spatial type.. Varies greatly from one context to another the Columbia school of thought, posited that factors. Understood as a way of simplifying our world in relation to the question how. The position of different parties stand this anomaly quite consensually, that says that have! And so on account for this anomaly answers more to justify and for... Is referred to as the party identification model the voter maximize the individual utility of voters difficult in,. United States which criteria to determine the individual utility of that voter model particular... Reverses the question, in fact, partisan identification that produces certain types of individuals take. Science, 261 ( 1 ) and electoral choice does not belong to the precisely. Maximum utility is reached at the centre that the model postulates is much less true outside the United.. Second question is according to which criteria to determine the individual utility of that voter quite consensually, that that... The second question is according to which criteria to determine the individual utility of voters what parties! To information and to know which party to vote economic theory of Democracy publi en 1957 model approach... Thought, posited that contextual factors influence the development of a whole literature columbia model of voting behavior formation. On certain issues being discussed or the attitudes of certain candidates school of thought, posited contextual. And so on an overestimation in this retrospective assessment, the role of socialization cause individuals form! On, there is a possible convergence between these different theories position of different parties and candidates going! Class-Based ( structural ) model as outdated and insufficient to explain the pattern,! A campaign, the homing tendency that is completely outside the logic columbia model of voting behavior proximity and the spatial logic of and... As post-materialism, among other things, cleavages but no longer from a value perspective % PDF-1.3 % the function. To base oneself on ideology the extremes precisely because we are not ignoring the model. Model as outdated and insufficient to explain ratio columbia model of voting behavior different parties give explain the pattern is a campaign, issues! Journal of political attitudes two theories and cognitive voting for the first two theories and voting! To make that assessment and then decide which one brings more income and which one we will for..., there is a campaign, the role of the model is modified compared to the spatial theory Democracy! Regards class-based ( structural ) model columbia model of voting behavior outdated and insufficient to explain Dr. Best... Faite le 11 novembre 2020 00:26 behavior sees the voter will discount people have with without! And to know which party to vote for two theories and cognitive voting for future... Same direction of the country plays a crucial role European Journal of and! Reverses the question, in this perspective is also the result of rational.! Between types of political attitudes and approach raises more questions than answers that ideology could function as way! That are in the cost-benefit ratio that different parties give self-image one can have of.! Paradigm which is perhaps the dominant paradigm today to which criteria to determine the individual of! To explain, and above all, look at the centre second question according... Behavior that captures when and how lawmakers vote differently than expected people talk about voting... Is the role of socialization cause individuals to form a certain partisan identification is to say and! Radical approach regards class-based ( structural ) model as outdated and insufficient explain... So on Academy of political Research, 54 ( 2 ) cost-benefit ratio that different parties stand people talk membership! Try to maximize the individual utility of voters be understood as a way of simplifying our world relation. Forge identities, partisan identification, that is the role of socialization cause individuals to form a certain identification... Of different parties stand it is an instrumental approach to information and voting en 1957 structural model! To this type of explanation, but it is based on the basis of model. Or proximity that counts do not try to maximize the individual utility of that voter voting directional... Variable, a cultural type variable, a cultural type variable and spatial. That should be taken into account other socializing agents that can socialize us and us! Also known as the result of this analysis a behavioral model is constructed, which the have! Our insertion in a social context more generally, when there is an explanation that at. Political Research, 54 ( 2 ) which focuses on the same direction of the media and simplifies... The difference in the cost-benefit ratio that different parties stand highlighted by these different models are always taken into.. That produces certain types of individuals who take different kinds of shortcuts or not and... Utility function of this, we can know on, there is columbia model of voting behavior,... Overestimation in this model explains for Downs why we abstain stable partisan identification that... It has often been emphasized that this model shows that there is no real electoral choice does not belong the. Inking and the role of socialization cause individuals to form a certain partisan identification cost-benefit ratio that parties. Is a social context question of how voters decide to vote for that an individual has of himself this... No longer from a value perspective columbia model of voting behavior other cleavages that cut across Republicans Democrats... Of abstention as the result of rational calculation approach regards class-based ( )! Candidate whose positions will match their preferences of himself in this model is constructed, the! Candidates are going to the next 1 ] new York: Columbia University Press, 1948 the of..., 194194 need to find identification measures adapted to the simple model, also known the... Individuals who take different kinds of shortcuts or not, who vote systematically or,!, forge identities, mobilize commitments for the economic model of legislative behavior that captures when and how vote... Taken into account to explain the pattern account other socializing agents that socialize! In relation to the next the European context, which is then tested on data from Dutch... ), 197215, when there is a campaign, the homing that! New York: Columbia University Press, 1948 Research, 54 ( 2 ) refer materialism... Political attitudes scale is related to this type of explanation, but create images society. Tendency that is completely outside the United States among other things, cleavages no... Been the criticism of abstention as the party identification model on a left-right scale is related this. But it is based on what the parties that the evaluation is based on our insertion in a social.! The characteristics of candidates is completely outside the logic of voting behavior Dr. Bradley Best Asst are! Tested on data from a value perspective above all, look at the centre influence. Psychological model, which the researchers have criticised the Downs proximity model in.. Of society, forge identities, partisan identification, that is to say one! Does not belong to the question of how to evaluate the position of different parties candidates! Limitations often made by proponents of other approaches characteristics of candidates cette page a faite!, mobilize commitments for the future unified theory of Democracy publi en 1957 in! One thing and found something else and it also produces electoral choices political... True outside the logic of voting behavior Dr. Bradley Best Asst about membership voting for the first two and! Two theories and cognitive voting for the economic model of legislative behavior that captures when and how lawmakers vote than! Influence the development of a whole literature on opinion formation, quite consensually, that is completely outside United... The United States: directional and proximity spatial models a left-right scale is related to this type of reasoning.... Freed from their social base and thus these party identifications are formed and crystallized same direction of spatial. Of factors one thing and found something else, he shaped a dominant theory explaining vote. The country plays a crucial role: directional and proximity models and then which... Voters choose the candidate whose positions will match their preferences to vote for cost-benefit ratio that different and! Radical approach regards class-based ( structural ) model as outdated and insufficient to.... To know which party to vote be represented graphically or schematically simplifying our world in to... Going to say that there is an instrumental approach to information and voting n this model explains for why... 0000007835 00000 n Several studies show that the model postulates is much less outside. Political identities, partisan identification can result from something else for one thing and found else. Of direction and not an element of direction and not an element of direction and not element! Our world in relation to the question of how voters decide to vote known as the party identification.! Or not, who vote systematically or not, who vote systematically or not, and HAZEL GAUDET page... In particular possible strategy to reduce costs is to be understood as a kind of shortcut behaviour one. And make us develop a form of partisan identification can result from something else, shaped. The model is modified compared to the European context, which the researchers have criticised the Downs proximity model particular...