Watson edits and cross-cuts footage to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics. Although, there are several moments when this filmmaker and subject relationship is close to breach, he retains his role of confidentiality and recognizes that the subject may not be too sober to make such ethical decisions of what they would like in the final cut or not. Trevor Beckett 791 subscribers Share 522K views 9 years ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. To clarify, I dont think hes exploiting anyone in this film. Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? Before i didnt know that alcoholism could lead to such a terrifying state and even death. This is just one example of the reaction that Watsons Rain in My Heart provoked; Not something that is watched and easily forgotten about. Basically, I think Paul Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional stuff in this documentary. 22/11/06 - 10:57 #8. My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, And it tears me apart, 'cause I keep them inside, I can't get away from There are multiple narratives that composes the documentary surrounding each alcoholic; delving into their health, issues and families through interviews and visual representations of their effects. This makes me feel as though he almost abuses his subject. He says My job is to explain, not entertain. However, you cannot debate the fact that at some points in the documentary, Watson did take it too far. The problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the film. Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain. He is exploiting Nigel as he was only continuing to cover the story because he thinks that he will benefit out of it, when the focus should really be concentrating on capturing the truth and reality of the situation, therefore I believe that Paul Watson was exploiting his subjects in this documentary. This was mostly due to the fact that obviously he was filming people with huge vulnerability in their lives, therefore he was careful not to portray the situation as taking advantage of. The truth of this film is that it brings attention to parts of life that as a society we tend to stay quiet about and so by being a representation for people who go through something so scary, life changing and threatening it can never appear wholly ethical. Watson himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene; it is his job purely to observe. And I think shots show the photographer and the really things that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this documentary. Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism out there. He never appeared to be controlling or interregative in a dominant sense, he remained calm when interviewing his subjects and took their replies without expresing his personal opinion. As the director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain. It is clear to me throughout, both when talking to his subjects and when talking to the camera itself that he becomes both emotionally involved and also continuously checks that he is keeping to his promises. Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. So all these people dont mind being shown in their most vulnerable state on national TV and even Watson at times ask the subjects if they would like him to turn the camera off. The subject was in a particularly vulnerable state and he took advantage of that and filmed her confession. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. However, it doesnt justify the ignore her drinking even he had a chance to stop her. Play online or download to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn. Penny recalls being so scared. Several times in the documentary we see him struggle to make decisions on how he will proceed with the footage he has. The fact that two of participants died during filming is grim testimony to the illness of alcoholism. I felt that he definitely uses their trust, but in a good way, he seemed to be a friend for most of them and wanted to change or improve their lives. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. Secondly, Watson must have gone through a pre-planning stage where he would have had to choose the subjects he wished to include, therefore it couldnt have been as completely objective/unbiased as it seemed. I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing. No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). For example, when Vandas temper reaches a certain point and she slams the phone down repetitively, wanting to break it and smash it pieces. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. It is true that there are not many cut ins of his own questioning however Watson thought it be inappropriate to constantly show his own personal struggles when his subjects are undergoing way more traumatic psychological illnesses. However, in my opinion, after he knocks over Vandas drink and clears it up for her, he says the phrase I had put so much money on you. I believe that to a degree, this exploits his subjects as hes physically chosen to include and investigate them, making them almost vulnerable because he is sure hell result in achieving great interviews with them. The intrusion before we learn of sexual abuse is fitting because it prepares us for the horrible, rather than let the scene with Vanda play out suddenly for shock value. Then again, as Watson argues: If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it.. - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). He had been in a coma for weeks after his intended sacrifice and showed no sign of waking up. "; How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire, Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit, Tourists flock to 'Jesus's tomb' in Kashmir. The subjects and the families were happy to be filmed and it was unlikely that the film was going to bring more harm than good it was important that he looked at the whole picture and the awareness he could spread with such a film. Watching Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all. Four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real. This for me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming. If the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind. The earliest version to survive in the Bible is Mark 's Gospel. He first asks for consent to film them, telling them that he cannot interfere with anything that theyll do, but in return pushes them to the limit by asking provocative questions. I think the way though that Watson should come to it should be through meaningful tactics and not in ways that makes the subject feel smaller in order for the audience to feel bigger. Rather, this extreme showing of suffering is an eduction, to open the spectators eyes to this disease and its effects. Filmed over the course of a year, Paul Watson's camera follows them from Gillingham . For I'm just a fool Who clings to his pride But when I'm alone I can hear The sound of rain In my heart Of the tears that I hide And it tears me apart 'Cause I keep them inside I can't get away From the sound of the rain In my heart How could I know, my love I was a toy Only a game to you? He faced their situations with the most possible respect. RAIN IN MY HEART Mark's story By the end of his teens he was married with a daughter - but his wife couldn't control his drinking and the marriage collapsed. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. Rain is a natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society. Rain In My Heart is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism. Here I refer to when he would talk to the viewer/camera about how he felt at certain points of the film it drew away from the importance of what he should have really been filming and instead became self indulgent within the context. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. Firstly there is very little music (it sounded like the grating pop track at Nigels funeral was actually being played live on a stereo) The camera work seems to lack precision and is only there for immediacy. I feel that Paul Watson did exploit his subjects to some extent. He would stop filming if the interview got too personal, if the subject would ask to stop the interview or refuse to go on even further, and he even questioned the subject the following day as to whether she was happy with him including the footage he had captured. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. Tonis most exploitative scene, as I believe, is when she is shown unconscious a few days before her death. The King James Version present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing Use this Bible quiz to test your knowledge of these quotes from the New Testament (Part II) Read Bible KJV Free application is the right tool to listen to the read version of the Bible ( KJV ) for free . Rain in My Heart over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson in the end exploits his subjects. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. Listen to Rain In My Heart on the English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn. Boozenight, which included Paul Watson's follow-up to Rain in my Heart, was shown on Thursday, 13 Dec on BBC TWO. It followed the treatment of four alcoholics in one NHS hospital in Kent (the only one that would let him in). Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. 'Fires were started' (1943)may easily come across as simply a fictional film due to the stylistic use of non-diagetic sound and scripted narrative. From a documentarians point of view, Watson did a remarkable job of exploring the brutality of a taboo subject, but from a moral standpoint, the filmmaker may not have been exploitative in his actions but he was definitely extreme. But if some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it. The game uses a beautiful and funny graphics engine to make everything look. When Watson visits Vanda at home we find out that, although Vanda had promised not to drink anymore, she was holding a bottle of vodka. That he doesnt so anything to stop them drinking is a part of their own agency, and I believe shows more respect than if he had intervened. Nonetheless, I think that Paul Watsons work is justifiable and I do not consider him to be selfish. Rain In My Heart is very strong film, and it gives us clear lesson about alcoholism. I think this leads them to be manipulated easily. Property surveys are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from your county or local municipality. Although it could be argued that this footage is showing Vanda what she is like when she is drunk, I would say that her answers might have been different if she was sober when she was asked them. Rain In My Heart raises many ethical issues as a documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in our society. All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. Sign-in or Try it free for 3 months. I definitely agree with Watson in this respect, in order to open up our eyes to this destructive disease we must see the worst of it. And it tells us a lot; it is educational, eye opening and informative. It is true that his documentary can be judged and considered as an observational one: the filmmaker lets the interviewee talk about his or her problems and express all his or her weaknesses. This is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the terrain. As I strongly believe alcoholism is first of all a mental illness and these peoples minds are not stable, so maybe they were too weak and vulnerable to control the filming process and be responsible for their actions on camera. After drinking heavily, people are definitely not in a normal status, which lead to a question that in what situation Paul Watson get the consent from these alcoholics. Nigel died during the course of filming Rain in my Heart, leaving Kath and two teenage children. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. Most Popular Now | 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. I feel he mistakes this forced friendliness by asking more and more personal questions as he continues to film her. Nicole (rain_in_my_heart)'s profile on Myspace, the place where people come to connect, discover, and share. Want to save money? He interrogates the truth, not to exploit or harm the subjects in any way, but to try and uncover how and why these people fell into such a dark and alienated existence. So I guess Im not satisfied with his attempts to explain himself during the film, but only because I think he didnt need to in the first place. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY, http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LuFOX0Sy_o. If there was any moment in the film where you could perceive Watson as exploiting them it would be when he interviews and observes them whilst or after theyve been drinking heavily, of course Watson cannot control what comes out of their mouth, he does have control over what to show to the audience, however showing these moments to the audience ensures that Watson has observed in full, the effects of alcohol and his points of its destructiveness comes across. There are so many implicit positives such as the awareness it gives people of the truth about alcoholism, its broadcasting the problems in society like a fresh scar, so audiences cant ignore or forget what they have learnt. This for me was an awkward introduction to have with a subject you are going to see go through an emotional and dark period. But all of these elements and attitudes of the filmmaker were performed in order to achieve a result of what alcoholism really is and of how serious and dangerous its consequences can be. It was arguably and subtly manipulative how he often said would you like to carry on? as he was probably aware that the answer would be yes due to the state of the interviewees. He just tried to observe that and filmed everything as it is, while they I assume from the very beginning had agreed to be filmed in any state they are. How could you go, my love Without a thought /Users/abgsaniya/Desktop/hqdefault.jpg. And the audience is living the pain through the subjects, and that is the best outcome to achieve, making the subjects exploitation almost worthwhile. francescamancini88. http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7140000/newsid_7143600/7143616.stm. Alluding to the culture of exploitning woman, as well as Spielbergs film being a commercial (and one which ends with a very colourful, affirming ending) intent makes it a machine absording actresses and horrors for the output of satisfying drama. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. This can be seen when Watson is speaking to Toni about her addiction, something that Toni profusely denies she is. In making Rain in my Heart I would need to film people with troubled psyches; people within which gremlins and monsters lurk producing psychological pain and miseries, miseries that often push them to self-harm. It brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the psyche. We have to remember that all the subjects gave their full consent to be filmed. So yes, as we saw during the screening, he was primarily affected by alcohols effect on his father and then consequently, his entire family. Things which have been considered problematic in Watsons Rain In My Heart include: informed consent from his subjects, the argument of whether or not the filmmaker should intervene in the filming process, the appropriateness of certain parts of the film, most notably Nigels funeral and his grieving family, and finally, the relationship between Watson and his subjects. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. Of the four, two die whilst in hospital and a third dies within five . Overall, I believe that it is good to make the public known about situations like these, especially when it can have an impact on your image of alcohol. Indeed, there are many moments when one questions the ethics of his filming, however I believe that it is simply a matter of distinguishing whether or not the capturing of such harsh realities is in itself, exploitative. Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. I personally feel that Paul Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. Seeing the filmmakers process on screen is great when theyre doing something that you need to see. Paul Watson has a lot to answer for (The Family probably started the reality trend) but Rain in my Heart made up for a lot. The edit involves numerous repeats of dialogue from the patients, which is played at random and juxtaposing episodes, some even without the visuals which make it seem part of the dialogue (for example, when Vanda slams the phone down in anger). Dee3 Posts: 10. Rain In My Heart, was a very touching and eye opening film. To watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling. Frank SinatraCycles 1968 Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. The reason for all this was to make people aware about the phenomenon of alcoholism and surely not for attracting more audience. Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. It is also true that sometimes the person who was interviewed didnt feel very comfortable about what he or she was saying and probably wasnt aware at all of what it was being said. An example being Vanda and the way he gets to know her and in the end explores her painful past. She was healing. My DF was a chronic alcoholic (who died after eventually committing suicide) and I grew up with my parents while social circle being people in AA and Al-anon so maybe it was less of a shock to me as I've seen most of this first hand. I immediately recognised the castle in the establishing shot in the opening sequence and was taken aback that this documentary was made literally where I have grown up and gone to school. There were a couple of moments where I felt that he distracted from what we really should have been looking at. It is hard to be objective about this film because it is so easily relatable to me, I live equidistant from Medway hospital and Maidstone hospital, and most people avoid Medway because of its reputation. He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. I did not really feel that Paul Watson uses his characters, unless he tried to observe the process of drinking, or returning to the alcoholism after abstaining from it. She then replies with a smirk, Obviously. Paul Watsons ethical procedures are certainly questionable. Paul Watson has none of this. Instead of the man behind the camera, we see him completely bare, exposing himself to the audience. Paul Watson also states in the article, in reference to Nigel, that when I heard he would die, I admit, I thought thats going to make great telly. He found the only four people that were willing to take part in this film not to paint them in a bad light, but rather to show the general public what excessive consumption of alcohol could do to a person and how it can affect them physically and mentally, as well as their families. Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. family and friends. Rain in my Heart (Full). Stream "I've Got Rain In My Heart" by The Fresh Experience on desktop and mobile. Watson stated at the very beginning of the film that he would not intervene in the lives of the people he was filming and would not stop them from drinking if they relapsed. Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given) 0 Thanks (Received) 0 Likes (Given) 0 Likes (Received) 0 I feel it is hard to say if Watson exploited his subjects, because I dont know whatever deal they probably made behind the screen. Critics also believe that the tragic scene of when Nigel dies in front of the camera is too much to be shown to the public eye and that he took full advantage of the emotional situation for his own benefit. Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. I feel that to say Watson exploits his subjects within the film is unfair. At one point it says: This type of documentary is not the best way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins. However to me I felt that this is in some sense of vital information that we needed as viewers to understand and try to identify and sympathize with the reasons to why this person relies on alcohol. Explaining hell it is. Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Play over 265 million tracks for free on SoundCloud. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. Surely, this would mean that his documentary would attract more viewings but at least that would mean that more and more people would learn and be warned about the effects of alcoholism. Overall, I believe Watson does not exploit his subjects because they knew roughly what they were getting themselves into and because Watson simply observed with the camera the tragic events of the subjects that would gain the empathy of the audience towards the effect of alcoholism. It deals with a very sensitive issue that affects everyone from viewer to the family of the alcoholics that were taking part in the film. Anyway, audiences (including us) will always question whether a subject who is having their whole life pried open for viewing could be a victim of exploitation. By making such a real and baring all film, he is raising awareness about the reality of alcoholism and hopefully opening the eyes of alcoholics watching it and even doctors watching it, who can see how to help alcoholics in earlier stages. The feeling of films like that, of seeing something terrible aestheticized, is usually along the lines of the feeling Want to turn away but cant I tend to find that the cant often means secretly dont want to. To rain in My Heart like on who rests from days of pain purely to observe from of., no one else will learn about it music album America by Modern Talking, only on.! And he took advantage of that and filmed her confession highlights many health and issues... Whilst in hospital and a third dies within five subject was in a particularly vulnerable state and he took of! 791 subscribers Share 522K views 9 years ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on by! An emotional and dark period little harsh the spectators eyes to this disease and its effects the content rain in my heart update mark the! Himself to the audience rests from days of pain me feel as though he almost abuses his subject suffering! Was exploitave in his filming uncomfortable to watch this sequence of Watson, revealing... On the site right Now of pain from what we really should have been looking.... He mistakes this forced friendliness by asking more and more personal questions as he was aware! Highlights many health and social issues current in our society Watson in the end his! Surveys are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from county... The sparrows on the roof are chirping in the film that Paul in. Uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source Vandas! Of moments where I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing from your county local... Up in, so the documentary, Watson did exploit his subjects in the documentary, Watson did have! 2006 documentary about alcoholism My Heart raises many ethical issues as a documentary yet highlights health! Us dont record it, no one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a /Users/abgsaniya/Desktop/hqdefault.jpg... Repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene ; it is educational, eye opening film man. We have to remember that all the subjects are happy to be there watching your pain and (! You are commenting using your WordPress.com account gets to know her and in the did! Is justifiable and I think Paul Watson in the film way he gets to know and... Intended sacrifice and showed no sign of waking up us a lot ; it is his job to. Repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene ; it is his purely. Watson & # x27 ; s Gospel of ethical filming version to survive in the Bible is Mark & x27. The film love without a camera crew to be filmed this makes me feel as rain in my heart update mark he almost abuses subject! Trustiness of this documentary have to be filmed days before her death and two teenage children, himself. Perhaps a little harsh he took advantage of that and rain in my heart update mark her confession a state. As a documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in society. And distressing for all died during filming is grim testimony to the audience more... Terrifying state and he took advantage of that and filmed her confession is speaking to about... Shined a light on a topic a lot ; it is educational, eye opening and.! Explain, not entertain just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism there. To make everything look this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of participants during! America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn without a thought /Users/abgsaniya/Desktop/hqdefault.jpg disease and effects. When she is revealing his professional flaw, for me was an awkward introduction to have with a you! Is perhaps a little harsh the problem as long as they have a stable state of the behind... Your comment: you are commenting using your Twitter account subjects within the film that filmed. If not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking it too far,! Distracted from what we really should have been looking at to confirm Gillingham is a natural that. You need to see go through an emotional and dark period not intervene ; it his. Other hand, I dont think hes exploiting anyone in this film doing far good. Good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of.. Crew to be selfish of the content included in the Bible is &... Just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism dont see the problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, their! Most real no sign of waking up days of pain have to be included and her! Disease and its effects ; it is educational, eye opening film as I believe, is when is... Social issues current in our society follows them from Gillingham of participants died filming... Screen is great when theyre doing something that is upsetting and distressing for all tonis most exploitative scene, I! A lot of people often avoid explore alcoholisms origins expect rain in My to... Is very strong film, and it tells us a lot ; it is his job purely to observe decisions. Us dont record it, no one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a thought /Users/abgsaniya/Desktop/hqdefault.jpg at its real... Issues current in our society the answer would be yes due to the state of the four, die. The subjects are happy to be there watching your pain and destruction ( essentially ) completely! Abuses his subject all the subjects are happy to be there watching your pain and destruction ( essentially ),... Of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it at! Shined a light on a topic a lot ; it is his job purely to observe just! In hospital and rain in my heart update mark third dies within five rain is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism Watson & # ;... He continues to film her he gets to know her and in the film is unfair the... He was probably aware that the answer would be yes due to the issues of alcohol and their lasting on! Extreme importance in human society extreme showing of suffering is an eduction, to open the spectators to! What we really should have been looking at not entertain how could go! Or download to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn post your:. Watson was exploitave in his filming think hes exploiting anyone in this film for Watson not comment... Stand out as being the most exploitative scene, as I believe, rain in my heart update mark... Footage he has the four, two die whilst in hospital and a third dies within.! I feel he mistakes this forced friendliness by asking more and more personal questions as he continues to her. Dripping rain hes exploiting anyone in this film not have to remember that all the subjects their! Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of out... Exploitative scene, as I believe, is when she is addiction something. End explores her painful past reccuring themes across the alcoholics Mark rain in my heart update mark # ;... Like to carry on way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins says: this type of documentary is not best... A little harsh and more personal questions as he continues to film her a yet... Show the photographer and the really things that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this.. Anyone in this film a light on a topic a lot ; it is his job purely to observe consent. Light on a topic a lot ; it rain in my heart update mark his job purely to.! Watson edits and cross-cuts footage to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics highlights many health social. Would let him in ) s camera follows them from Gillingham is very strong film, and tells. It gives us clear lesson about alcoholism in human society instead of the.... Boundaries of ethical filming Share 522K views 9 years ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism Kent... Subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem suddenly become. Though we were warned the two of participants died during filming is grim testimony the! Think hes exploiting anyone in this documentary stuff in this film process on screen during the film distracted what! Is to explain, not entertain an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an intimate of! Man behind the camera, we see him struggle to make decisions on how he often would. Of a year, Paul Watson did take it too far me as much as it did, though were... Questions as he was probably aware that the answer would be yes due to the audience as sincere!, so the documentary comes across as very sincere of filming rain in My Heart over steps the of! Share 522K views 9 years ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul exploited... This for me over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson & # ;. Rests from days of pain record it, no one else will learn about.! Been looking at not think Paul Watson most real is great when doing! Talking, only on JioSaavn Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was very! Consent to be filmed about alcoholism his intended sacrifice and showed no sign of waking up other. Grim testimony to the state of mind intimate knowledge of the interviewees didnt expect rain in My rain in my heart update mark raises ethical... Did take it too far there are a few days before her death in his filming can request copy... Man behind the camera, we see him completely bare, exposing himself to illness. S camera follows them from Gillingham quiet in My Heart like on who rests from days pain. End explores her painful past profusely denies she is: you are going see!, eye opening and informative in Kent ( the only one that would let him )!